Read more: “Ten years ago, a group of universities started a collaborative software project touted as an alternative to commercial software companies, which were criticized as too costly. On Friday the project’s leaders made a surprising announcement: that it would essentially become a commercial entity
The software at issue, called Kuali, does the boring but important work of managing accounting, billing, e-commerce, budgeting, and other campus functions. Colleges can pay software companies tens of millions of dollars for these mission-critical tools, and the vision of Kuali was to take a do-it-yourself approach. The nonprofit Kuali Foundation helped manage development of free software that any college or university could use, in what was called a “community source” model. From the beginning the software has been open source, meaning that anyone can look under the hood of the software and make changes to it.”
Nature released the results of a survey of over 3,500 researchers on their use of social networks for collaboration.
The results are broken down by research area, and explore the frequency and depth of use by researchers. The full, open access article is available online.
Check out Mark Sandler’s Guest Editorial in the latest issues of Collaborative Librarianship, v6, n1, 2014
“Under the watchful eye of librarians and library administrators, library consortia are unlikely to flourish, instead, slowly withering over time from a lack of sustenance. In an effort to combat this, expect that consortia leaders will continual-ly refine and amplify their messaging, but to no avail. Without the superpowers of Aquaman, swimming upstream against a current of library self-interest would prove both exhausting and futile. A more promising strategy for library consortia—especially those with an expansive vision of their future role—is to redirect their messaging beyond library directors to win the support of library funders and library users. By painting a compelling picture of a better infor-mation future—a scaled up, cooperative future like the Justice League of America—consortia could potentially attract substantial funding and substantial powers. If it is indeed true that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts, then a managed network of libraries should be in a po-sition to realize President Wells’ vision, quoted in the header to this article, of “a union of strengths,” capable of delivering greater value at lower costs. For library funders and library us-ers, that would be super.”
ALA Editions has a new book out on collaborative partnerships.
Blurb: “Because libraries are information and research centers, they can support a huge variety of grant funding initiatives outside their own purview. Cultural centers, businesses, and educational institutions are untapped resources for library funds. What’s more, many libraries may find that collaborating on a grant application with another organization is preferable to going forward with a time-consuming application of their own. But finding the right collaborative partner and securing a place at its development table can be challenging. Drawing on her extensive experience as a grant developer and library director, in this ALA Editions Special Report Maxwell
Presents an overview of grant basics, with extensive lists of both online and print resources
Suggests how to frame libraries’ research capabilities as benefits to the community at large, transforming these capabilities into a revenue source”
The Open and Collaborative Science in Development Network (OCSDNet) was developed to explore whether, and under what conditions open and collaborative approaches in research could achieve development goals at multiple levels, from individuals through the global community.
The OCSDNet website is available for researchers and practitioners interested in collaboration in science, and the organization is currently seeking proposals for concept notes.
On Tuesday, August 12, the server for the journal at the Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries will undergo hardware maintenance. Thus, the journal will be down from 5pm MDT until late in the evening that day. The journal should be fully accessible by Wednesday morning, August 13.
F1000Research will be holding a tweetchat focusing on ‘Advocating for Open Science as an Early Career Researcher’ today at 1PM EDT. The guests are:
“These students and early-career researchers will discuss their experiences with open science advocacy, their concerns about publishing openly in terms of career advancement, and suggestions for institutional reforms that could support Early Career Researchers (ECRs) in being open with their research. We will also provide details about OpenCon 2014 and how ECRs can apply to attend. Use #F1000Talks to follow along.”