A new issue of the journal is available – Volume 6, Issue 2

Vol 6, No. 2 (2014): Volume 6, Issue 2

Table of Contents

Editorials

Taking Community to the World PDF
Jamie LaRue 59-60

Scholarly Articles

Just the Two of Us: Those Who Co-Teach, Co-Learn Abstract PDF
Talitha R. Matlin, Allison Carr 61-72
Two Approaches to Collaborative Information Literacy Instruction at a Small Engineering School Abstract PDF
Conor Cote, Scott Juskiewicz 73-81

From the Field

Collaboration in eTextbook Publishing: A Case Study Abstract PDF
Erin N. Wimmer, Anne Morrow, Alice Weber 82-86
Library Collaboration: International Perspectives. An Interview with Dr. Shimelis Assefa, Associate Professor, Library and Information Science, University of Denver Abstract PDF
Shimelis G. Assefa, Janet Lee 87-91
The Library in 2020 Abstract PDF
Jill Hurst-Wahl 92-93

Viewpoints: Technology Matters

Using Technology to Increase Community Engagement PDF
Lori Bowen Ayre 94-95

Reviews

Review of Voyant Tools PDF
Megan E. Welsh 96-97
Review of Studying Students: A Second Look PDF
Juliann Couture 98-99
Review of “The Bookless Library,” New Republic PDF
Ellen Mackey 100-101

Planning from the Middle Out: Phase 1 of 2CUL Technical Services Integration

Article in Collaborative Librarianship v. 6 #1

Kate Harcourt, Jim LeBlanc

Abstract: The Columbia and Cornell University Libraries’ partnership is now in its fourth year. Its composite acro-nym (2CUL), which condenses a doubling of the two participating libraries’ initial letters, in itself reflects the very nature of the collaboration’s strategic purpose: a broad integration of library activities in a number of areas – including collection development, acquisitions and cataloging, e-resources and digital management, and digital preservation. In what is perhaps their boldest, most ambitious 2CUL initiative to date, the two libraries have begun planning for and have taken the first steps towards an integration of their substantial technical services operations. In this paper, the authors outline the goals of 2CUL Technical Services Integration (TSI), report on the first phase of the work, reflect on what they have learned so far in planning for this operational union, and look forward to the next steps of the project in which the two institutions will initiate incrementally the functional integration of the two divisions. The period covered in Phase 1 of TSI is September 2012-December 2013.

Collaboration Article in Archival Practice

Lori Birrell and Marcy Strong from the University of Rochester, River Campus Libraries have published an article in Archival Practice that details a collaborative effort between catalogers, reference subject specialists and special collections librarians to process manuscript collections.

The article discusses how their experience could form the foundation of a model for sustainable collaboration in the academic library. The full text can be found on the journal’s website.

“Cool Tools for Collaboration and Information Sharing”

Article in the Sept/Oct 2014 issue of Online Searcher.
“New tools and apps that facilitate sharing, increase accuracy, and enhance productivity are welcome additions to the information professional’s toolkit. Barbie Keiser identifies several that will cut down on the frustrations encountered when ideas are lost and work must be redone.”
By Barbie E. Keiser

Crowdsourcing Consortium for Libraries and Archives (CCLA),

Press Release

On behalf of our partners at Dartmouth College and Boston Public Library, we are pleased to announce the launch of an exciting new initiative, funded by the Institute for Museum and Library Services (IMLS), that will examine how libraries, archives, and museums, can most effectively use crowdsourcing techniques to augment their collections and enhance their patrons’ experience!

This initiative, provisionally entitled the Crowdsourcing Consortium for Libraries and Archives (CCLA), will employ a series of meetings and webinars to collect, examine, and share the most recent, cutting-edge technologies, tools, and platforms and accompanying best practices in the field.  The goal of the CCLA is to create a forum that enables all interested stakeholders to join a national conversation about the most pressing needs and challenges regarding the development and deployment of crowdsourcing technologies in the cultural heritage domain.

As a first step in this process, we want to hear from you!

The CCLA team invites you to take a short 10-minute survey to share your thoughts on the current state of crowdsourcing in libraries, museums, and other cultural heritage institutions. Your opinions and insights will directly inform the agenda of upcoming CCLA activities and events, influence the discourse of current and future discussions, and have the potential to translate into real-world applications.

Thank you!

P.S.To stay informed about upcoming CCLA events, please follow us on Twitter: @crowdconsortium

 

Collaborative That Once Criticized Software Companies Becomes One

Read more: “Ten years ago, a group of universities started a collaborative software project touted as an alternative to commercial software companies, which were criticized as too costly. On Friday the project’s leaders made a surprising announcement: that it would essentially become a commercial entity

The software at issue, called Kuali, does the boring but important work of managing accounting, billing, e-commerce, budgeting, and other campus functions. Colleges can pay software companies tens of millions of dollars for these mission-critical tools, and the vision of Kuali was to take a do-it-yourself approach. The nonprofit Kuali Foundation helped manage development of free software that any college or university could use, in what was called a “community source” model. From the beginning the software has been open source, meaning that anyone can look under the hood of the software and make changes to it.”

Nature article on Online Collaboration

Nature released the results of a survey of over 3,500 researchers on their use of social networks for collaboration.

The results are broken down by research area, and explore the frequency and depth of use by researchers. The full, open access article is available online.